-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Collect pieces for SSP 2024/ScenarioMIP #235
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #235 +/- ##
========================================
- Coverage 76.5% 60.9% -15.6%
========================================
Files 203 205 +2
Lines 15546 15737 +191
========================================
- Hits 11896 9597 -2299
- Misses 3650 6140 +2490
|
526f5cb
to
334106a
Compare
Add scripts to modify "Low" and "Very Low" ScenarioMIP/SSP scenarios
@GamzeUnlu95 @macflo8 —there now appears to be a conflict in a particular materials data file. I think this is the same one modified in #247 (FYI also @glatterf42 who reviewed there). Can you please say whether these two changes to the file are perhaps the same, or different? Does one supersede the other, or are they parallel/non-overlapping? This will allow to rebase and update the branch, which we need to do (urgently) in order for it to be usable in the ScenarioMIP process. |
* Add additional technology "meth_fs_ind" between meth_t_d and demand * Move CO2_Emision from "steam_craker_petro" and "meth_t_d" to "production_HVC" and "meth_fs_ind"
* Adjust existing methanol input and olefin output coefficients * Add butylene, C5H10+ and fuel gases yields as refinery_gas and lightoil output * Adjust CO2_cc relation coefficient to reach 1:1 in/out carbon balance
Changes made for solar_res, meth_coal, meth_coal_ccs and nuc_hc technologies.
The reply (in Slack) was that the changes in #247 supersede the ones that were on this branch.
|
input changes by year_act rather than year_vtg
This is the script to modify ssp setup to feasibly run low_overshoot scenarios. Important to note that modification to share constraints for end-user technologies for the transport sector is omitted here. I suggest that this is performed in the transport model so if there are updates from their side, this script does not accidentally remove the updates
Please note that the location of ccs setup data is hardcoded in this function. Please edit according to user's data path
Add CCS and DAC scripts to SSP_dev
This PR is to track the working branch
ssp-dev
, which exists to help with work on the SSP 2024/ScenarioMIP project by collecting or pointing to all the code that is actually used to execute the workflow.The goal is to be complete and up-to-date as possible for that purpose; other aspects (code quality, cleanliness, or readiness for
main
) are less important.How to use
main
, so will include those updates.How to review
TBD: this PR may not eventually be merged.
PR checklist
Continuous integration checks all ✅TBD if this will be required.Add or expand tests; coverage checks both ✅Add, expand, or update documentation.Update doc/whatsnew.